xSellize: xNews

Jump to content




Remove all advertisements.

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-15-12 15:23 - 22 comments

Posted Image

iSpazio, the Italian iPhone site, has recently finished an interview with i0n1c and released it on their blog. Read the full interview below:

Quote

Greetings and welcome on iSpazio.net! Let's start by talking a little about yourself: we know that you're a professional figure in the hacking. How did you “gain” this passion for technology, and when did you start to hack something?

Quote

I got my first computer when I was about 8 and broke it one week later because I was tweaking some settings I was not supposed to tweak. My parents did not want me to waste time playing video games so I learned programming instead and was very interested in doing the low level stuff. But I guess I was at least 16 until I started so realize the wonderful things you can achieve by changing the code of other people. I guess I could have gotten earlier into the game, but I never had any kind of internet or mailbox access on my own before I was 17/18.


For most of our users, you're famous because of the iOS 4.3.X's jailbreaks and recently for the unreleased jailbreak technique for iOS 5.1 and 5.1.1: how's dealing with iOS security?

Quote

Dealing with iOS security is like dealing with any other security topic, with the difference that it is more challenging than PHP security or web application security which was my previous research topic. The other difference is that hacking iPhones and researching jailbreaking topics brings you in contact with the actual enduser that directly benefits from your work. This is something very different from other fields in security. Most of the time you only deal with application developers that do not really like that you find problems in their code, or with admins that have to upgrade to the newest version of a piece of software. I guess there are not many fields in IT security where the actual enduser has ever heard the name or nick of a person involved in finding a vulnerability or writing the actual exploit. Having experiences both I think I prefer an angry developer over an angry jailbreaker.


We've heard that you're not releasing the iOS 5.1 and 5.1.1 jailbreak because, for many users, jailbreak means piracy: is there actually a way to block it?

Quote

Whatever you have heard about why I am not releasing a jailbreak is most probably wrong. The jailbreak community tends to just pick random tweets and spin rumours or consipracy theories around them. As an example I get a number of request by email or twitter every day from people who want to pay money to get the jailbreak, because they heard I sell it. In fact I never said that I would sell my jailbreak, I merely discussed the fact that while the developers do all the work for free there are plenty of people who make a huge sum of money with every new jailbreak. There are the people that sell Cydia apps, the people that make iOS newsites and tutorials about JBing (including ads), the people who get paid for installing the free JB on someone's device, the people that weaponize the public exploit for malicious purposes, the people that just take eg the bootrom exploit and create expensive tools for law enforcement agencies from it, the security researchers that can only do research on jailbroken devices and sell consulting afterwards. I might have forgotten some other players that make money out of a free jailbreak, but I think you get the picture. People in the JB community seem to not understand that from my point of view spending months of work to perfect a JB and then releasing this for free is a waste. And of course they are angry when I tell pod2g about it because they fear I convince him to do something more valuable with his time.

Speaking of piracy. I am pretty sure that it would be possible to do a JB that will block the most common ways to install pirated applications on a device. But there is no way to stop pirates from reversing the JB and tweaking it. It might take them a while, because after all iOS JBs involve low level kernel code that can do all kinds of dirty tricks, but in the end they would figure it out. Maybe not fast enough until Apple closes the vulnerability and effectively kills the jailbreak. After all it would not be worth the hassle. Why would someone like Musclenerd or Pod2g spend days or weeks coding something like that, knowing that it would only last a few days.


If nowadays users do jailbreak only for piracy purpopes, do you think that there is still someone that actually do it for have full control of their own iPhone?

Quote

Of course there are people that jailbreak because they want to have full control of their own iPhone, of course there are people that need a jailbreak to install the latest Cydia tweaks and of course there are people that jailbreak to do security research or whatever. But each of these groups highly overestimates their own size and importance. The vast majority of people have always jailbroken for pirating stuff or unlocking their phone. Whoever denies this is delusional. When you look at average people and their jailbroken iPhones you will see they have hundreds of Applications installed and Apple is lucky if they paid for a single one of it.
And yes there is also a group of people that say they only pirate apps and buy them later because there is no way to try an app before you buy it. I personally think that Apple could solve that legitimate request by offering such feature.
For me it doesn't matter what reason people jailbreak for, it has no influence on my decision to not waste months of my work just to enable other people to do what they want.


On may the 8th, your new book about the hacking of iOS finally came out: why did you feel the necessity to write it?

Quote

Well whenever a field develops over the years and more and more content for a specific topic is collected at some point the logical consequence is to write a book about it. Of course nowadays you can find a lot of information on the internet but this information is usually spread over hundreds of websites and sometimes important facts are not yet public at all. So the idea to create a book and collect all this information in one place allows someone new to the field to dig through it in a easier way. So in the long run this book will allow more people to get into iOS hacking in a faster way. However iDevices are not an easy target to attack and therefore it requires years of training or expericence to actually own them.
The problem with the JB community at this point is that they don't understand that in the long run this book might bring new people into the scene of jailbreaking iDevices. Most of the people in the JB community do not understand that. They believe it will help Apple to stop jailbreaking or they consider it an attempt to make big money out of the JB community. This kind of reaction shows how little they understand of what is going on, first everybody who wrote a book about a tech topic will tell you that there is no big bucks made by writing tech books. Especially not if there are six authors for one book. And the other misbelief is that Apple employs a bunch of stupid elephants that do iOS security. In reality the people working at Apple on iOS security topics are actually quite skilled and they have way better debugging tools than the JB community will ever have. The reason why they don't kill a JB one day after a release is most probably only of political nature. Apple only seems to close JBs fast if they could be used maliciously by drive by attackers. Aside from that they keep those vulnerabilities open for a while, because every sold device is a sold device.
Also by looking at the JB community they can gather intelligence about features their customers might want, which in the long run will increase their revenue even more. I don't think Apple is really too concerned about piracy due to jailbroken devices, because they know there is only a limited amount of money you can squeeze out of a person anyway.


What do you think about the iCommunity? Do you think it is all “populated” by pirate users or people that send yo often bad messagges?

Quote

Pirates are everywhere and they do not concern me. If you loose any sleep because of them, then good luck surviving in this world. I think the JB community suffers from something worse. It is “contaminated” by leeches that do not value other people's work at all and do not understand the amount of work required to create things. They believe they are entitled to get whatever they see and just need to cry out loud enough if they don't get it. They believe they own the iPhone JB developers and that they have to produce jailbreaks for them for all eternity or shut up. You can see how delusional these people are when you get messages like: “Without us you are nothing, we follow you on Twitter and we made you famous” and then there are messages like “unfollow him to teach him a lesson”. Everytime I see these messages I hope for mankind that these people do not really believe that. People are not getting famous because they have hundreds of thousands of followers on twitter, it is the other way around: they did (create) something people liked and this attracted followers. And if you consider yourself famous, because a few people on the internet know your name is up to you. I don't think one can consider himself famous until people on the street recognize your face and you have to hide from paparazzi. Anyway the amount of followers on twitter is only of concern to me because it is directly related to the number of people I have to ban manually.


How's dealing with those guys everyday? I mean, not everyone can hold such a situation for so long: for example, I remember that because of this, geohot hold the iOS 4.X jailbreak. Do you see from your twitter at least some supporters for your hard work?

Quote

I don't think it has anything todo with “hold such a situation”. In the beginning you are annoyed and cannot believe the amount of angry and demanding people, but once you get over that initial shock you just continue to do whatever you want. I can understand if Geohot hold the iOS 4.x jailbreak because of these people. Because getting this kind of response is a wake up call that tells you that these people are not worth that you donate your work to them for free. However Geohot and the Chronic Dev Team are/were also collecting donations – so they obviously got enough to keep them going.
I also think that a part of this whole situation is caused by certain jailbreak developers who write blog postings where they claim that they will work day and night to get the new jailbreak to them. This blatant lie is the kind of statement that will be loved by the crowd, while in reality work is only done when there is free time and the mood to do it. However telling the truth will make people dislike you and most probably donate less.


We've done with our interview! Thanks for your time: would you mind say something to our users?

Quote

Oh I think I said everything I wanted to say for now and now I sit back with popcorn to await the criticisms' wave.


via iSpazio
Read 1522 times - last comment by PurpleHaze420     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-15-12 04:51 - 4 comments

Posted Image

Today has been a big day for pod2g, providing us with news like no tomorrow about his jailbreaks. Here is where you can find all the info released from him today.

Jailbreak Compatibility

Posted Image

The iOS 5.1 untether jailbreak pod2g is working on will work with all devices on 5.1/5.1.1 EXCEPT for iPhone 3GS (New Bootrom), iPod 3G (New Bootrom), and ATV 3. Pod2g does not have any info as to if these devices will ever receive an untethered jailbreak for this firmware or when it will be available.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Jailbreak Release Date

Posted Image

Pod2g stated that people should expect the jailbreak release in a couple of weeks, but also mentioned that something big would be announced at the Hack in the Box conference in Amsterdam. The Chronic Dev Team, who is responsible for providing pod2g's jailbreaks in a user friendly interface, also tweeted such information as well. This means that we could be seeing the jailbreak being released to users during the conference.

Posted Image

Of course, this conference could be entirely unrelated to the release date of pod2g's jailbreak, but the conference runs until May 25th, which is within the two week time frame pod2g put for his jailbreak release.

Now that everyone is up to date on the iOS 5.1/5.1.1 jailbreak, what does everyone think about it?
Read 1607 times - last comment by Drieks     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-13-12 05:19 - 1 comments

Posted Image

Apple released iOS 5.1.1 early this week, which didn't bring much except for bug fixes. However, it is always important to save the SHSH blobs of any firmware you can.

NotCom, developer of TinyUmbrella, updated his program to 5.11.00, which adds support for iOS 5.1.1, meaning you can now save SHSH blobs for iOS 5.1.1 with the updated program.

I cannot emphasize how important it is to save your SHSH blobs. If you have not done so yet, it is a good idea to start doing so, as it can be the difference between having a jailbroken device and not.

TinyUmbrella [OSX]
TinyUmbrella [Windows]

via The Firmware Umbrella
Read 945 times - last comment by SaMaHy     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-13-12 05:12 - 1 comments

Posted Image

Yesterday, the iPhone Dev-Team released one of the most monumental redsn0w updates in a while, bringing downgrade support to A5/A5X devices. However, the update lacked the support of iOS 5.0.1 9A406, meaning only the older build, 9A405, was all that was supported. That meant those who only had SHSH blobs for the 9A406 build could still not downgrade.

Today, the Dev-Team updated RedSn0w to 0.9.11b2, adding support for the 9A406 build of iOS 5.0.1. So to those who have been waiting for that build to be supported, you will wait no longer. Download links are below, as well as full information on RedSn0w 0.9.11.

redsn0w 0.9.11b2 for OS X
redsn0w 0.9.11b2 for Windows (be sure to run in Administrator mode)

via Dev-Team Blog
Read 938 times - last comment by jayman     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-11-12 16:20 - 4 comments

Posted Image

Pod2g has confirmed that his jailbreak for iOS 5.1 will work for iOS 5.1.1 as well:

Quote

OK, tested on an iPad 3,1 running 5.1.1. Jailbroken untethered. :-) No issue.


This is good news to those who updated to 5.1.1 and did not save their SHSH blobs for 5.1, not allowing them to downgrade with the recently updated redsn0w. The jailbreak is expected in the next couple of weeks, released in a tool by the Chronic Dev-Team.

Stay tuned for updates!
Read 1020 times - last comment by okatokat     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-11-12 16:05 - 0 comments



pod2g yesterday upon news of stating that he had a jailbreak for iPad 3 on 5.1 released a demo video showing the jailbreak. There is still no ETA on the release of the jailbreak, but he states that it will most likely be within a few weeks.
Read 0 times - make a comment     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-11-12 15:59 - 22 comments

Posted Image

The redsn0w we have all been waiting for. Redsn0w 0.9.11b1 has finally been released, bringing us the long awaiting A5/A5X downgrade for those who have their SHSH blobs. Read below to see what should be considered before attempting a downgrade or downloading the updated redsn0w:

Quote

What’s old is new again!

Jailbreakers with devices that pre-date the iPad2 will always be able to downgrade (with SHSH blobs) to previous firmware versions due to geohot’s limera1n exploit, which allows us to bypass the restrictions that Apple places on restores. But until now, that ability has been limited to those older devices (if you have an older device and don’t know how to do that, check the popular tutorial sites or ask in the comments below).

Starting with redsn0w version 0.9.11b1, those with newer devices (iPad2, iPad3, and iPhone4S) can join the downgrade fun too! In a radical departure from previous versions of redsn0w, it now directly supports restoring IPSWs to your device. The first use of this new feature implements a hack that allows A5 downgrades without a bootrom-level exploit.

Some important points:

  • The new feature is at Extras->Even More->Restore
  • You cannot downgrade without the personalized SHSH blobs for your device at that lower firmware. You need to have fetched those blobs while the signing window was open, using either Cydia’s built-in TSS@Home feature, or with TinyUmbrella. The new Restore screen of redsn0w lets you choose either the remote blobs or local ones (for the earlier firmware). If you don’t know where TinyUmbrella put your blobs, TinyUmbrella has a button that will show you (copy them out of that folder and feed them to redsn0w).
  • The A5 downgrade method actually updates to the latest firmware before downgrading to the earlier one. This process updates your baseband to whatever is newest. DO NOT USE THIS METHOD IF YOU RELY ON UNOFFICIAL UNLOCKS of your iPhone4S. Those who used the temporary SAM technique to unlock their iPhones to specific SIMs shouldn’t be affected by this baseband update.
  • This method can be fixed by Apple with a firmware update. It’s a (pleasant) mystery why they haven’t fixed it yet, because reverse-engineering of the restore ramdisk indicates they do know about it. It’s possibly too niche to bother to fix right now.
  • The least-tested devices with this method are the iPad2,3 and iPad3,2 (because we don’t have those models). If you do and you feel like experimenting, please let us know how it turns out in the comment section below!
  • This update involves a bunch of new redsn0w code. We recommend sticking to the previous version 0.9.10b8b unless you’re specifically using this new feature, until all the bugs are worked out! (Note: If redsn0w gets stuck at the “Waiting for device” stage for more than 30 seconds, you’ve hit a pesky GUI bug…that will be fixed in an upcoming version!)

Of course all eyes are on @pod2g for his upcoming 5.1 untethered jailbreak. Watch his blog or twitter feed for the latest updates about that, but in the meantime if you accidentally updated your jailbroken A5 device to something later than 5.0.1, feel free to try this new A5 firmware downgrade feature of redsn0w!

Update #1: We accidentally left out one of the two flavors (“9A406”) of 5.0.1 for iPhone4S. It’ll be in the next update, but in the meantime check if Cydia or TU saved your blobs for the other 5.0.1 for iPhone4S (“9A405”).


So, those who are really waiting on a jailbreak, what are you waiting for? Download redsn0w and downgrade your device!

redsn0w 0.9.11b1 for OSX
redsn0w 0.9.11b1 for Windows (Run in Administrator Mode)
Read 997 times - last comment by PigPox     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-10-12 18:49 - 12 comments

Posted Image

Pod2g has stated today on Twitter that he got his iPad 3 running an iOS 5.1 jailbreak untethered:

Quote

Hey. iPad 3,1 running iOS 5.1 untethered. Next on the list: stabilizing the payload, then trying 5.1.1.


Looks like the next steps is to stabilize the jailbreak and work out bug fixes, according to pod2g. He also plans to test his jailbreak on iOS 5.1.1 to see if it still works. However, according to multiple developers, the exploits for iOS 5.1 still work on iOS 5.1.1. However, it is good to hear from pod2g a confirmation on the matter.

If iOS 5.1.1 breaks pod2g's jailbreak, it does not mean it is the end of the world. Those who have their SHSH blobs saved for 5.1 are in luck, as a redsn0w update is planned to be released that brings downgrading capabilities for all devices, including A5/A5X devices such as the iPhone 4 and iPad 3.

For those of you who are asking about jailbreak compatibility, this should answer your question:

Posted Image

Stay tuned for updates!
Read 1413 times - last comment by r0bop0lo     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-09-12 00:52 - 26 comments

Posted Image

Musclenerd has recently tweeted that a redsn0w update is coming up, providing users with the ability to perform restores without iTunes and the capability of downgrading the 4S and iPad 2/3:

Posted Image

This is excellent news for those who have an iPhone 4S or iPad 2 and are stuck on iOS 5.1, as they can downgrade to 5.0.1 with their blobs and jailbreak their devices. It is also great to have the restore feature in redsn0w, breaking the required use of iTunes to perform jailbreaks.

Update: Musclenerd in another tweet has stated that this method used to downgrade devices is NOT the same as iH8sn0w's. iH8sn0w's downgrade method had legal problems whereas this one does not.

No ETA on when the updated redsn0w will be release, but expect it soon!
Read 3001 times - last comment by r0bop0lo     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-07-12 22:27 - 10 comments

Posted Image

According to a tweet by Musclenerd, the recently released iOS 5.1.1 has indicated that Apple knows about ih8sn0w's unreleased downgrade technique:

Quote

5.1.1 shows Apple knows about an unreleased technique to downgrade A5 devices to 5.0.1 with saved blobs (but left it alone..hmm)


ih8sn0w, developer of sn0wbreeze, tweeted a couple months back about how he had found a loophole that would allow him to downgrade devices, and that he was able to do so on his devices successfully, including the iPhone 4S and iPad 2. However, his downgrade method has not been released yet, probably due to further testing and stability measures needed.

However, this is not looking good as we might see in a further iOS update a patch that would break the unreleased downgrade method. It is surprising to see that that Apple now knows what the downgrade method is but has yet to patch it in iOS 5.1.1. This makes it the only for iH8sn0w to get this out, before it is patched in the future.
Read 1450 times - last comment by surfingboy111793     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-07-12 17:42 - 2 comments

Posted Image

Apple pushed out iOS update 5.1.1 today, bringing bug fixes and performance updates:

Quote

This update contains improvements and bug fixes, including:

  • Improves reliability of using HDR option for photos taken using the Lock Screen shortcut
  • Addresses bugs that could prevent the new iPad from switching between 2G and 3G networks
  • Fixes bugs that affected AirPlay video playback in some circumstances
  • Improved reliability for syncing Safari bookmarks and Reading List
  • Fixes an issue where ‘Unable to purchase’ alert could be displayed after successful purchase

For information on the security content of this update, please visit this website: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222


So far there is no word as to whether it is safe for jailbreakers who are waiting for an iOS 5.1 jailbreak to update or not, but to play it safe, do NOT update until you have the OK to do so.

UPDATE: There is now word from MuscleNerd:

Posted Image

Though this can change in the near future based on findings, there is now official confirmation that jailbreakers should not update, especially those on the iPhone 4S or iPad 2/3.
Read 1023 times - last comment by CrankySnorlax     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-04-12 16:22 - 0 comments

Posted Image

Anand Tech has been busy this evening, not only showing Apple’s iPhone 4S vs. the Galaxy S3 benchmarks, but also with a small detail in the new iPad 2 that many have overlooked.

“The new iPad 2,” you might ask? Yes. When Apple released the new iPad with A5X processor and Retina display, it also released the “iPad 2,4.” It is mostly the same as the iPad 2, which Apple has sold for over a year. However, Apple traded a 45nm A5 processor for a new 32nm A5 in the iPad 2,4. It is the most efficient processor Apple makes, and it is likely to be the same 32nm die size as the upcoming iPhone’s processor. (The 1080P Apple TV also employs a 32nm A5 processor, but it is limited to single core.)

Anand got the iPad 2,4 from a Best Buy and noted most Apple Stores still sold the older 45nm version. For battery life, the new iPad 2,4 saw anywhere from 1.6 hours of additional time in Web browsing to almost three extra hours in some graphics and 3D video intensive tests. Those are significant gains.

Posted Image

As you can see below, the processor is much smaller in the new iPad 2,4. It will be interesting to see if Apple updates its iPad 2 specs in the coming weeks and months to reflect the new battery life reality on its iPad 2s.

via 9to5Mac
Read 830 times - make a comment     

User is offline  
bob_the_nailer 
- 05-04-12 14:21 - 14 comments

Posted Image

pod2g claims his iPhone 4 is running 5.1 untethered.
Seems like the pieces of the puzzle are falling together.
Let's see what he decides to do with his findings.
The poll at his blog has been closed and 106473 (64%) voted to release the jailbreak and burn the exploits found...
Read 1290 times - last comment by traktor03     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-03-12 05:32 - 0 comments

Posted Image

There recently have been a lot of rumors about a liquidmetal iPhone 5, especially with one being a liquidmetal chassis for an iPhone 5. Apple has had the rights to Liquidmetal since 2010, but so far it has only been seen in one application, the Sim Ejector Tool that is included with iPhones. Business Insider decided to take the liberty of asking one of the Liquidmetal inventors, Atakan Peker, some questions regarding to when we should see Apple use Liquidmetal in one of their devices. From the interview, the following was gathered:

  • Liquidmetal looks great, yet is incredibly strong and durable.
  • Apple has exclusive rights to use Liquidmetal in gadgets.
  • It could be a few more years before Apple can make a Liquidmetal MacBook.
  • Apple will likely wait to use Liquidmetal in a "breakthrough product."

From this, it could be determined that Apple will most likely not use Liquidmetal in an iPhone 5, even though it would seem like what would be needed for this year's most important iPhone release, as it would make the phone a "breakthrough product." However, according to Peker, Apple still does not have the capability of building devices with Liquidmetal casing, and that they are currently limited to small components and accessories, similar to the Sim Ejector Tool for iPhones.

Business Insider has the full interview on their website, with Peker explaining Liquidmetal, its applications, and going a bit more in depth on Liquidmetal and Apple. Hit the source link below for the full interview!

via Business Insider
Read 0 times - make a comment     

User is offline  
CrankySnorlax 
- 05-01-12 16:49 - 13 comments

Posted Image

As rumors about Apple switching to the all-new metallic glass material for a next-generation iPhone continue to persist, one designer has weighed in with own rendition of what the device might look like, both from the inside and the outside – and it’s quite noteworthy.

As you know, Apple obtained a worldwide exclusive license to use Liquidmetal alloy in consumer electronics products. With previous rumors alleging a complete redesign, a Liquidmetal-based iPhone is certainly a plausible proposition…

French designer Antoine Brieux has gone all out creating these gorgeous sixth-generation Liquidmetal iPhone shots, available on his blog.

The use of the new metallic glass alloy would let Apple create a stronger, lighter and thinner iPhone, with a body just 7.9mm thin (versus the 9.3mm profile of the current iPhone 4S).

Gone is the physical home button (though a recent leak hinted otherwise) as Brieux envisions a virtual home button sitting at the screen bottom.

The concept calls for a large 4.5-inch widescreen display that could, however, create issues with third-party apps.

Here’s a shot depicting the Angry Birds on a widescreen Liquidmetal iPhone.

Posted Image

And another one showing a tweaked bezel running around the sides of the device.

Posted Image

Here’s another angle. Notice the virtual home button occupying the extra space gained by blowing up the iPhone’s 3:2 display to a larger 16:9 widescreen appearance.

Posted Image

And yet another angle. Check out the 3.5mm audio jack in the middle.

Posted Image

As for the innards, Brieux thinks the device will be powered by a quad-core A6 chip.

Do check out the source link for more gorgeous shots. Also useful: our coverage so far on Apple’s use of Liquidmetal alloy.

Is this what a Liquidmetal iPhone could look like?

I think it looks business and certainly shows some hallmarks of Apple’s trademark industrial design.

The question is, would Apple really buck its own trend and blow up the iPhone’s display to a whopping 4.5 inches?

via iDownloadBlog
Read 1822 times - last comment by Dazza1     

Additional Content

Latest Discussions


Close  Member Login